From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:51:29 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] Add more options to eudev package. In-Reply-To: References: <20151020203326.GA31310@free.fr> <20151021212450.1c6fc5b4@free-electrons.com> <5627EEE3.3010302@mind.be> <20151021221804.483ac95d@free-electrons.com> <5627F815.6090701@mind.be> Message-ID: <56289581.5000604@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 22-10-15 08:53, David Kosir wrote: >>> However, there is still the question: why eudev in /, and not any other >>> package that other users may find important to have in / ? Where do we >>> put the boundary ? >> >> Because eudev is already installed mostly in / - as I said, even if libudev.so >> is installed in /usr/lib, there's still a symlink created to point to it from >> /lib. Same for udevadm: installed in /usr/bin but a symlink is created from >> /bin. Basically, it's eudev itself that decides it should be in / in addition to >> /usr. > > Exactly, you can check in src/libudevMakefile, install-exec-hook. > >> This patch looks good, but was not sent properly and did not appear in our >> patch tracking system. Can you resubmit properly, using git send-email? > > I will try it. I just copy-pasted in into gmail as send-mail was > complaining about something regarding ssl. I guess that is why it > didn't work. 'git help send-email' gives a very good explanation about how to configure gmail. Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout dot vandecappelle at essensium dot com Senior Embedded Software Architect . . . . . . +32-478-010353 (mobile) Essensium, Mind division . . . . . . . . . . . . . . http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium . . . . . BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF