Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4 RFC] xorg: fix installation paths (branch yem/xorg)
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 07:38:17 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56373D19.6080303@zacarias.com.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151102003607.1fa9f695@gmx.net>

On 01/11/15 20:36, Peter Seiderer wrote:

>> The new pkconf bumped in d7f6d320 introduced a change in behaviour: all
>> path variables returned by pkgconf are now prefixed with the sysroot
>> directory.
>>
>
> ...this commit breaks some other packages too, see [1] for libv4l example.
>
> This commit removed a patch named '0002-fix-double-sysroot.patch', I think
> this patch should somehow be forward ported to the new pkconf packet...
>
> Regards,
> Peter

Hi Peter.
That's wrong, double-sysroot is natively removed by the newer versions 
of pkgconf, if you have this:

./usr/lib/pkgconfig/libxslt.pc:Libs: -L${libdir} -lxslt  -lxml2 
-L/home/gustavoz/b/midx11/output/host/usr/x86_64-buildroot-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/lib 
-lz -lm -ldl -lm

And do this:

$ ./pkg-config --libs libxslt
-L/home/gustavoz/b/midx11/output/host/usr/x86_64-buildroot-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/lib 
-lxslt  -lz -ldl -lm -lxml2

The output is as expected.

The problem is two-fold as we discussed with Yann last night.
On one side the pkg-config manpage says:

  PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR
   Modify  -I  and -L to use the directories located in target sys?
   root.  this option is useful when cross-compiling packages  that
   use  pkg-config  to  determine CFLAGS and LDFLAGS. -I and -L are
   modified to point to the new system  root.  this  means  that  a
   -I/usr/include/libfoo will become -I/var/target/usr/include/lib?
   foo with a PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR  equal  to  /var/target  (same
   rule apply to -L)

So pkgconf is being "too happy" in applying the sysroot prefix to all 
directories it finds in any variable.

On the other hand on the previous 0001-fix-variable.patch it did:

if ( !strcmp(req.variable, "includedir") ||
         !strcmp(req.variable, "mapdir") ||
         !strcmp(req.variable, "sdkdir") ||
         !strcmp(req.variable, "libdir"))
               printf("%s%s\n", sysroot_dir, req.buf);
       else
               printf("%s\n", req.buf);

So it was adding the sysroot prefix for mapdir & sdkdir as well, very 
much out of specification (we'll call the manpage a spec), catering for 
package abuse.

In the end our previous pkgconf was working out of spec, which may be 
ok, but poses the question, how many of these variables should be 
patched/prefixed as well? Because in the future other packages with 
their $nonstandard variable may need this as well, and patching and 
patching pkgconf for eternity doesn't sound so great.

First pkgconf should be patched to fix the out-of-spec functionality and 
send that upstream, but variable exceptions won't roll.

For the second problem i think mangling the .pc files would be best for 
the special variables, based on a per-package definition where you can 
say which other variables should be prefixed.

Regards.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-02 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-01 23:00 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4 RFC] xorg: fix installation paths (branch yem/xorg) Yann E. MORIN
2015-11-01 23:00 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4 RFC] package/x11r7: introduce X11-global configure options Yann E. MORIN
2015-11-01 23:00 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4 RFC] package/x11r7/*: fixup all install paths Yann E. MORIN
2015-11-01 23:00 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4 RFC] core/pkg-generic: allow step hooks to fail a step Yann E. MORIN
2015-11-01 23:00 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4 RFC] core/pkg-generic: check proper package installation Yann E. MORIN
2015-11-01 23:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4 RFC] xorg: fix installation paths (branch yem/xorg) Peter Seiderer
2015-11-02 10:38   ` Gustavo Zacarias [this message]
2015-11-02 17:19     ` Peter Seiderer
2015-11-02 17:33       ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-11-02 18:04       ` Gustavo Zacarias

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56373D19.6080303@zacarias.com.ar \
    --to=gustavo@zacarias.com.ar \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox