Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaap Crezee <jaap@jcz.nl>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2 v3] package/nodejs: add version 4.1.2
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 13:42:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5651B83C.1030701@jcz.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5651094A.5080607@mind.be>

On 11/22/15 01:16, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:

Thanks for your follow up!

>  You have a good point. I don't think it's possible to have a NEON core without
> VFP floating point unit. Hm, looking at [1], NEON and FPU are independently
> optional, so theoretically you could have a Cortex-A9 with one but not the
> other. But that probably doesn't exist in practice (in fact, we don't know any
> Cortex-A9 that doesn't have both).

You are right, I dived further into it:

http://www.arm.com/cortex-a9.php

Advanced SIMD NEON? unit (Optional)

and

Cortex-A9 Floating-Point Unit (FPU)
(Optional)


But... as you also state, I have never seen any Cortex-A8 or higher witout a VFP-unit.
Anyone? Because that's stupid of me, but I advise clients about (TI though) Cortex-A8 and
higher in always having a VFP unit...

>  However, I think it should be fixed in Config.in.arm instead. Basically,
> whenever NEON is selected, the VFP's 'maybe' should be converted into a 'has'.
> So something like
> 
> --- a/arch/Config.in.arm
> +++ b/arch/Config.in.arm
> @@ -244,6 +244,9 @@ config BR2_ARM_ENABLE_NEON
>         bool "Enable NEON SIMD extension support"
>         depends on BR2_ARM_CPU_MAYBE_HAS_NEON
>         select BR2_ARM_CPU_HAS_NEON
> +       select BR2_ARM_CPU_HAS_VFPV3 if BR2_ARM_CPU_MAYBE_HAS_VFPV3
> +       select BR2_ARM_CPU_HAS_VFPV4 if BR2_ARM_CPU_MAYBE_HAS_VFPV4
>         help
>           For some CPU cores, the NEON SIMD extension is optional.
>           Select this option if you are certain your particular
> 
>  (Note that the VFPv2 cores never have NEON - at least as far as I know. Checked
> arm.com and that seems to be correct.)

Agree. I see the compiler being called with -mfpmath=neon (or something alike) so it seems
to be working next to VFPv2.

>  However, when you look at it like that, the option is not named correctly. What
> the option is really about is specifying that the optional floating point/NEON
> unit is indeed present.

Here you have a good point.

>  Alternatively, if we really do want to support the case where only one of NEON
> and VFPv3/4 is present, we should have a separate option similar to
> BR2_ARM_ENABLE_NEON to enable the FPU. And in that case, of course, all the
> MAYBEs should be removed from the Floating point strategy choice.

Anyone has more available time than me to look into patching this? Would be greatly
appreciated; would be using this for various customers of mine...


See http://www.arm.com/Cortex-A9-chip-diagram-LG.png also.

regards,

Jaap Crezee

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-22 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-19 21:59 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/2 v3] package/nodejs: bump version (branch yem/node) Yann E. MORIN
2015-10-19 21:59 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2 v3] package/nodejs: fix architectural dependencies on ARM Yann E. MORIN
2015-10-19 21:59 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2 v3] package/nodejs: add version 4.1.2 Yann E. MORIN
2015-10-20  8:25   ` Martin Bark
2015-10-20  9:01     ` Richard Chapman
2015-10-20 16:25     ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-10-20 16:32       ` Martin Bark
2015-11-21 19:53         ` Jaap Crezee
2015-11-22  0:16           ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-11-22 12:42             ` Jaap Crezee [this message]
2015-11-22 21:28             ` Martin Bark
2015-10-20  8:02 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/2 v3] package/nodejs: bump version (branch yem/node) Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5651B83C.1030701@jcz.nl \
    --to=jaap@jcz.nl \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox