From: Jaap Crezee <jaap@jcz.nl>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2 v3] package/nodejs: add version 4.1.2
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 13:42:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5651B83C.1030701@jcz.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5651094A.5080607@mind.be>
On 11/22/15 01:16, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
Thanks for your follow up!
> You have a good point. I don't think it's possible to have a NEON core without
> VFP floating point unit. Hm, looking at [1], NEON and FPU are independently
> optional, so theoretically you could have a Cortex-A9 with one but not the
> other. But that probably doesn't exist in practice (in fact, we don't know any
> Cortex-A9 that doesn't have both).
You are right, I dived further into it:
http://www.arm.com/cortex-a9.php
Advanced SIMD NEON? unit (Optional)
and
Cortex-A9 Floating-Point Unit (FPU)
(Optional)
But... as you also state, I have never seen any Cortex-A8 or higher witout a VFP-unit.
Anyone? Because that's stupid of me, but I advise clients about (TI though) Cortex-A8 and
higher in always having a VFP unit...
> However, I think it should be fixed in Config.in.arm instead. Basically,
> whenever NEON is selected, the VFP's 'maybe' should be converted into a 'has'.
> So something like
>
> --- a/arch/Config.in.arm
> +++ b/arch/Config.in.arm
> @@ -244,6 +244,9 @@ config BR2_ARM_ENABLE_NEON
> bool "Enable NEON SIMD extension support"
> depends on BR2_ARM_CPU_MAYBE_HAS_NEON
> select BR2_ARM_CPU_HAS_NEON
> + select BR2_ARM_CPU_HAS_VFPV3 if BR2_ARM_CPU_MAYBE_HAS_VFPV3
> + select BR2_ARM_CPU_HAS_VFPV4 if BR2_ARM_CPU_MAYBE_HAS_VFPV4
> help
> For some CPU cores, the NEON SIMD extension is optional.
> Select this option if you are certain your particular
>
> (Note that the VFPv2 cores never have NEON - at least as far as I know. Checked
> arm.com and that seems to be correct.)
Agree. I see the compiler being called with -mfpmath=neon (or something alike) so it seems
to be working next to VFPv2.
> However, when you look at it like that, the option is not named correctly. What
> the option is really about is specifying that the optional floating point/NEON
> unit is indeed present.
Here you have a good point.
> Alternatively, if we really do want to support the case where only one of NEON
> and VFPv3/4 is present, we should have a separate option similar to
> BR2_ARM_ENABLE_NEON to enable the FPU. And in that case, of course, all the
> MAYBEs should be removed from the Floating point strategy choice.
Anyone has more available time than me to look into patching this? Would be greatly
appreciated; would be using this for various customers of mine...
See http://www.arm.com/Cortex-A9-chip-diagram-LG.png also.
regards,
Jaap Crezee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-22 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 21:59 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/2 v3] package/nodejs: bump version (branch yem/node) Yann E. MORIN
2015-10-19 21:59 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2 v3] package/nodejs: fix architectural dependencies on ARM Yann E. MORIN
2015-10-19 21:59 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2 v3] package/nodejs: add version 4.1.2 Yann E. MORIN
2015-10-20 8:25 ` Martin Bark
2015-10-20 9:01 ` Richard Chapman
2015-10-20 16:25 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-10-20 16:32 ` Martin Bark
2015-11-21 19:53 ` Jaap Crezee
2015-11-22 0:16 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-11-22 12:42 ` Jaap Crezee [this message]
2015-11-22 21:28 ` Martin Bark
2015-10-20 8:02 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/2 v3] package/nodejs: bump version (branch yem/node) Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5651B83C.1030701@jcz.nl \
--to=jaap@jcz.nl \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox