From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 21:45:32 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/Makefile.in: remove HOSTCC_VERSION In-Reply-To: <20151129185224.695095a2@free-electrons.com> References: <1448147919-5463-1-git-send-email-arnout@mind.be> <87fuzx676p.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <56536E0C.1010205@mind.be> <20151129185224.695095a2@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <565B63EC.70907@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 29-11-15 18:52, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Arnout, > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:50:36 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > >>> Ehh, no. I guess a 4.x version would make more sense. Any idea what 'x' >>> should be? 3? 5? 7? >> >> We'd need to check all the host packages (plus the packages that build a host >> tool as part of the target build, like uboot) to be sure of that. The >> autobuilders tell us that 4.7 at least is OK. > > My autobuilder instance uses gcc 4.4: > > test at build:~$ gcc -v > [...] > gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8) > > (Yes, I'm running old stuff. On purpose.) So, should we set it to 4.4? Ideally we should have a test instance on RHEL5 as well, there are definitely still company deployments based on that. RHEL5 has gcc 4.1. RHEL4 has gcc 3.4 but I don't think that that is very useful. Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF