From: Pascal Mazon <pascal.mazon@6wind.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: generate libtermcap
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 11:39:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565ECA64.3070503@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151130233049.3ad42bd1@free-electrons.com>
On 11/30/2015 11:30 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Pascal Mazon,
>
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:54:26 +0200, Pascal Mazon wrote:
>> There is no libtermcap package in buildroot, but ncurses implements
termcap
>> natively. Furthermore, ncurses already provides the termcap.h header
file.
>>
>> With this patch, we fix an issue encountered with some external
toolchains
>> that include a libtermcap.a (typically the GNU libtermcap version)
in their
>> sysroot folder.
>> Bash, for instance, would be linking with this libtermcap while using
>> headers from ncurses.
>>
>> In order to be consistent, let's make sure there is only the ncurses'
>> termcap library. To that effect, we:
>> - remove any libtermcap.* in the staging dir,
>> - install a link to libncurses static and/or shared in staging and
target
>> dirs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pascal Mazon <pascal.mazon@6wind.com>
>
> We finally took a bit of time on IRC today to discuss your patch. From
> our point of view, the fact that your toolchain provides libtermcap.a
> is a bug of the toolchain. From Buildroot's point of view, a toolchain
> should not provide in its sysroot anything but the C library and its
> headers, and the kernel headers.
>
> If we start doing hacks in packages to cope with toolchain sysroot
> already shipped with some libraries, it's going to be an endless fight
> against those toolchains. You have the problem with libtermcap.a, but
> the next person will have it with libz.a, and then lib<something>, and
> again.
>
> Our suggestion is that you fix your toolchain either by asking your
> toolchain vendor, or by doing a quick hack to remove libtermcap.a
> before using the toolchain with Buildroot. If you add this toolchain as
> a known Buildroot profile, you can even automate this and make it part
> of the build process.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
>
I understand buildroot's point of view.
Indeed, it does not look like the best solution to hack in packages for
a problem from the toolchain.
I will try your suggestion.
Maybe we can modify copy_toolchain_sysroot in toolchain/helpers.mk to
add a custom "--exclude" when rsync-ing (with values taken from an newly
added option)?
Best regards,
--
Pascal Mazon
www.6wind.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-24 12:54 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: generate libtermcap Pascal Mazon
2015-04-24 14:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-04-27 8:11 ` Pascal Mazon
2015-07-19 9:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-11-30 22:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-02 10:39 ` Pascal Mazon [this message]
2015-12-05 17:39 ` Yann E. MORIN
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-20 9:11 Pascal Mazon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565ECA64.3070503@6wind.com \
--to=pascal.mazon@6wind.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox