From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:46:40 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] xutil_util-macros: move outside x11r7 scope In-Reply-To: <20151216234223.6abe26c3@free-electrons.com> References: <1449096338-8006-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <20151216234223.6abe26c3@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <5671E9D0.9000703@zacarias.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 16/12/15 19:42, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Since you're renaming the Config.in option, some Config.in.legacy > handling is needed. Hi. True, however much i doubt anybody is using it in their packages. > I am wondering if util-macros isn't too generic. Should we name it > xorg-util-macros ? xorg-autotools-macros ? But admittedly, that's not > matching the upstream name. In gentoo there's only one util-macros which has far more packages than buildroot, however in the future some other util-macros might appear so yes, xorg-util-macros sounds about right. This is just the tip of getting wayland/weston/gtk3 support back in shape, it's still WIP in some aspects but i want to push as many as the little bits as possible since they don't hurt and i don't want to pile up patches. I'll respin a v2. Regards.