From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 15:12:16 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 10/12] package/x11r7/xserver_xorg-server: bump version to 1.18.0 In-Reply-To: <20151219141714.5da170a3@free-electrons.com> References: <1450522892-14611-1-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <1450522892-14611-10-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <20151219141714.5da170a3@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <567565C0.4090902@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 19-12-15 14:17, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Bernd Kuhls, > > Adding Arnout in Cc, since he is our legacy handling expert :) > > On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 12:01:30 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote: >> - added legacy handling for BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_V_1_17 > > Is this really needed? In any case, without legacy handling, the thing > will automatically fall back to version 1.18, which is what we want. So > I'm questioning whether legacy handling is needed. I would normally say that we should still have legacy handling here, to draw people's attention to the fact that something in the .config changed. However, it's just a change of version, and versions are changing all over the place, so indeed legacy handling isn't needed here. Regards, Arnout > >> - legacy handling for BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_VIDEODRV_ABI_19 >> is not needed because this option is not used by other packages > > BR2_PACKAGE_XSERVER_XORG_SERVER_VIDEODRV_ABI_19 is a blind option, so > there is no point in adding legacy handling for it. [snip] -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF