From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien CORJON Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:04:41 +0000 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 4/5] qt5webengine: new package In-Reply-To: References: <1436380555-13657-3-git-send-email-corjon.j@ecagroup.com> <1436538022-18924-1-git-send-email-corjon.j@ecagroup.com> <1436538022-18924-4-git-send-email-corjon.j@ecagroup.com> <20150719150236.422b5b79@free-electrons.com> <55ACBCAF.6050404@ecagroup.com> <20150720112515.0b05d1ef@free-electrons.com> <20151223094050.GA14019@t450s.lan> <20151223104913.39d70293@free-electrons.com> <567A7450.70404@ecagroup.com> Message-ID: <567AB808.5080702@ecagroup.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Gary, Le 23/12/2015 15:21, Gary Bisson a ?crit : > Julien, Thomas, All, > > Thanks for the quick replies. > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Julien CORJON wrote: >> Gary, >> >> Le 23/12/2015 10:49, Thomas Petazzoni a ?crit : >>> Gary, >>> >>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:40:50 +0100, Gary Bisson wrote: >>> >>>> Any update on this package? I'm asking since webkit is declared as >>>> deprecated/legacy without an alternative. Let me know if I can be of any >>>> help. >> >> I did not work on this qt module since my previous post. And QtWebkit >> will be removed in Qt 5.6.0 released package (but sources will be still >> available [1]) >> >>> >>> Right now, there is no longer any qt5webengine patch pending in >>> patchwork, so we're waiting for someone to resend an updated version of >>> the patch. >>> >>> If you have some time, and Julien Corjon agrees, maybe you can adopt >>> his patch? >> >> Sure, you can adopt my patch and make every modifications needed to make >> it work :-) > > Ok I'll look at it when I have time. I definitely would like to see > the package for next release. Not sure I'll be able to submit anything > before next year though. Chromium is not an easy one. I give up because I didn't had enough time and skill... > > Regarding the current patch, I'm not sure about the armhf patch, does > it default to armhf all the time (except when OS=android) even if the > toolchain doesn't support it? It default to armhf for arm7 even if the toolchain doesn't support it. It had some issue to compile with the linaro toolchain so i took this patch from chromium. > Also dependencies need some work since this package implicitly depend > on OpenGL, so the select of BR2_PACKAGE_QT5DECLARATIVE_QUICK can fail > currently. Indeed > >> With the release of Qt 5.6.0-beta I have start a branch to take a look >> on status of pending Qt patch and evaluate the integration effort of the >> 'new/not integrated yet' modules in Buildroot (canvas3D, location, >> QuickControl2, Wayland, WebEngine, WebView). > > I don't feel brave enough to look at all those items, that's for sure. > I'll let you know once I've spent some time on webengine. > > Regards, > Gary >