[Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] Qwt package : added dependency to Qt5 besides Qt.

[David Picard <davepiq@yahoo.fr>]

Hi,

I could implement Yann's suggestions. The Config.in is more symetric, 
and I dropped the comment about SVG (no more recursive deps).

In the OpenGL section, I can understand :
depends on BR2_PACKAGE_QT_OPENGL_ES || BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE_OPENGL_LIB

But I am afraid that I won't be able to make the automatic dependency in 
the .mk file, as Arnout suggests, because I have no idea of how to do 
it. Would you have an example in mind that I could have a look at ? Or 
will it do it as is ?

When I am done, should I submit the patch as a new patch ? Or do you 
have a different procedure for revised patches ?

Thanks,
David.



Le 24/01/2016 02:09, Arnout Vandecappelle a ?crit :
> On 22-01-16 19:19, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
>> David, All,
>>
>> On 2016-01-22 18:44 +0100, David Picard spake thusly:
> [snip]
>>> @@ -21,10 +23,14 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_QWT_OPENGL
>>>   	bool "OpenGL support"
>>>   	depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_LIBGLES
>>>   	depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_LIBEGL
>>> -	select BR2_PACKAGE_QT_OPENGL_ES
>>> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_QT_OPENGL_ES if BR2_PACKAGE_QT
>>> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE_OPENGL_LIB if BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE
>>
>> BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE_OPENGL_LIB depends on BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE_OPENGL, so
>> it should have been selected too.
>>
>> However, I'm a bit worried about the complexity here, and I'd rather
>> that we depend on such support rather than select it. So I'd prefer to
>> see:
>>
>>      depends on BR2_PACKAGE_QT_OPENGL_ES || BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE_OPENGL_LIB
>
>   In that case, it can probably be removed completely and turned into an
> automatic dependency (i.e. just in the .mk file).
>
>   I also wouldn't bother with legacy handling when this symbol is removed. The
> legacy .config file will already contain BR2_PACKAGE_QT_OPENGL_ES, so once the
> handling is automatic, you just have to run 'make oldconfig' and it will Just
> Work (TM).
>
>
>   Regards,
>   Arnout
>
> [snip]
>
>