From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luca Ceresoli Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:18:03 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 11/16 v3] core/legal-info: also save patches In-Reply-To: <415acb524afa715f0b51d6f1b3344a63e90301ee.1454004518.git.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> References: <415acb524afa715f0b51d6f1b3344a63e90301ee.1454004518.git.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Message-ID: <56ADDF5B.9040300@lucaceresoli.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Yann, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Currently, the legal-info infra only saves the source archive of a > package. However, that's not enough as we may apply some patches on > packages sources. > > We do suggest users to also redistribute the Buildroot sources as part > of their compliance distribution, so the patches bundled in Buildroot > would indeed be included in the compliance distribution. > > However, that's still not enough, since we may download some patches, or > the user may use a global patch directory. Patches in there might not > end up in the compliance distribution, and there are risks of > non-conformity. > > So, always include patches alongside the source archive. > > To ensure reproducibility, we also generate a series file, so patches > can be re-applied in the correct order. > > We get the list of patches to include from the list of patches that were > applied by the package infrastructure (via the apply-patches support > script). So, we need to get packages properly extracted and patched > before we can save their legal-info, not just in the case they define > _LICENSE_FILES. > > Update the legal-info header accordingly. > > Note: this means that, when a package is not patched and defines no > LICENSE_FILES, we will extract and patch it for nothing. There is no > easy way to know whether we have to patch a package or not. We can only > either duplicate the logic to detect patches (bad) or rely on the infra > actually patching the package. Also, a vast majority of packages are > either patched, or define _LICENSE_FILES, so it is best and easiest to > always extract and patch them prior to legal-info. > > Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" > Cc: Luca Ceresoli > Tested-by: Luca Ceresoli > > --- > Changes v2 -> v3: > - also mention that patches have been saved (Luca) > > Changes v1 -> v2: > - don't recompute rawname-version needlessly (Luca) > --- > package/pkg-generic.mk | 13 ++++++++----- > support/legal-info/README.header | 9 +++++---- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/package/pkg-generic.mk b/package/pkg-generic.mk > index 7ad3bc3..c5b66db 100644 > --- a/package/pkg-generic.mk > +++ b/package/pkg-generic.mk > @@ -759,12 +759,10 @@ $(2)_MANIFEST_LICENSE_FILES = $$($(2)_LICENSE_FILES) > endif > $(2)_MANIFEST_LICENSE_FILES ?= not saved > > -# If the package declares _LICENSE_FILES, we need to extract it, > -# for overriden, local or normal remote packages alike, whether > -# we want to redistribute it or not. > -ifneq ($$($(2)_LICENSE_FILES),) > +# We need to extract and patch a package to be able to retrieve its > +# license files (if any) and the list of patches applied to it (if > +# any). > $(1)-legal-info: $(1)-patch > -endif > > # We only save the sources of packages we want to redistribute, that are > # non-local, and non-overriden. So only store, in the manifest, the tarball > @@ -826,6 +824,11 @@ ifeq ($$($(2)_REDISTRIBUTE),YES) > $$(Q)$$(call hardlink-copy,\ > $$(DL_DIR)/$$($(2)_ACTUAL_SOURCE_TARBALL),\ > $$($(2)_REDIST_SOURCES_DIR)) > +# Copy patches and generate the series file > + $$(Q)while read f; do \ > + $$(call hardlink-copy,$$$${f},$$($(2)_REDIST_SOURCES_DIR)) || exit 1; \ > + printf "%s\n" "$$$${f##*/}" >>$$($(2)_REDIST_SOURCES_DIR)/series || exit 1; \ > + done <$$($(2)_DIR)/.applied_patches_list > endif # redistribute > > endif # other packages > diff --git a/support/legal-info/README.header b/support/legal-info/README.header > index d07c45d..0b5aa66 100644 > --- a/support/legal-info/README.header > +++ b/support/legal-info/README.header > @@ -14,10 +14,11 @@ This material is composed of the following items. > compiled programs. > Note: this may have not been saved due to technical limitations, you may > need to collect it manually. > - * The source code for all packages; this has been saved in the sources/ > - subdirectory (except for the non-redistributable packages, which have not > - been saved); patches applied to some packages by Buildroot are included in > - the Buildroot sources and were not duplicated in the sources/ subdirectory. > + * The original source code for all packages; this has been saved in theo theo -> the With that fixed: Reviewed-by: Luca Ceresoli You already carried my Tested-by tag, I re-tested this and it works fine. -- Luca