From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mauro Condarelli <mc5686@mclink.it>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 13:32:24 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v5 18/20] python-service-identity: new
	package
In-Reply-To: <20160219224047.6276af21@free-electrons.com>
References: <1455188328-7595-1-git-send-email-mc5686@mclink.it>
 <20160219224047.6276af21@free-electrons.com>
Message-ID: <56C85CD8.2000608@mclink.it>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Thomas.

Il 19/02/2016 22:40, Thomas Petazzoni ha scritto:
> Mauro,
>
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:58:46 +0100, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Mauro Condarelli <mc5686@mclink.it>
> Just a quick comment: it is really horrible for people
> reviewing/applying your patches that you sent this patch separately
> from the rest of the series. Now I have to manually figure out that
> this patch labeled 18/20 in your v5 is in fact needed for patch 09/17
> in your v4.
Sorry about that.
I was (and perhaps am) still trying to fully understand workflow.

> Please resend full series, so that the dependencies between patches
> remain explicit. Or if you don't do that, resend the new iteration of a
> patch as a reply to the previous patch and with the same sequence
> number.
Ok.
Next time I'll resend the full series and then I'll mark the previous one as "superseded" in Patchwork.
Should I do something to link together the (versioned) series? They seem to appear as independent in Patchwork.

> Thanks,
>
> Thomas
Regards and Apologies
Mauro