From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vicente Olivert Riera Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:55:39 +0000 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] Disable gcc-4.8.x + binutils-2.26 + MIPS combination In-Reply-To: <20160315143610.4441a7d2@free-electrons.com> References: <1458041310-65003-1-git-send-email-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> <20160315143610.4441a7d2@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <56E8145B.5060704@imgtec.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Thomas, On 15/03/16 13:36, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Vicente, > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:28:29 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: >> For the same reason as we disabled it for binutils-2.25 before. >> >> See 2fda0dd7d491e6e926ace1cd09ad2fb241356232 for details. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vicente Olivert Riera >> --- >> package/gcc/Config.in.host | 5 +++-- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/package/gcc/Config.in.host b/package/gcc/Config.in.host >> index 4845708..513899e 100644 >> --- a/package/gcc/Config.in.host >> +++ b/package/gcc/Config.in.host >> @@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ choice >> depends on !BR2_cortex_a12 && !BR2_cortex_a17 >> # Broken or unsupported PPC cores >> depends on !BR2_powerpc_power8 >> - # gcc-4.8.x + binutils-2.25 is broken for MIPS >> - depends on !((BR2_mips || BR2_mipsel || BR2_mips64 || BR2_mips64el) && BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_25_X) >> + # gcc-4.8.x + binutils >= 2.25 is broken for MIPS >> + depends on !((BR2_mips || BR2_mipsel || BR2_mips64 || BR2_mips64el) && \ >> + (BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_25_X || BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_26_X)) > > If neither binutils 2.25 nor binutils 2.26 are working, which binutils > version is working? Only the older 2.24 ? The combination (gcc < 4.9) + (binutils < 2.25) are OK. Currently in Buildroot we can combine gcc-4.8 with binutils 2.23.2 and 2.24. Regards, Vincent. > If that's the case, then I would probably just mark gcc 4.8 as not > usable on MIPS, especially since it's broken with the new binutils > versions. > > Best regards, > > Thomas >