From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:18:21 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 08/16] toolchain-buildroot: update glibc comment for noMMU In-Reply-To: <1458164602-16983-9-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> References: <1458164602-16983-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1458164602-16983-9-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <56E9E9BD.2040107@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 03/16/16 22:43, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > glibc is not available for noMMU platforms, so it doesn't make sense > to show the comment about glibc requiring dynamic libraries on noMMU > platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni > --- > toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > index cb4fc18..ea290eb 100644 > --- a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_GLIBC > http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/ > > comment "(e)glibc only available with shared lib support" > + depends on BR2_USE_MMU Actually, the rest of the architecture dependencies should also be repeated then. It's a huge blob, so maybe introduce GLIBC_ARCH_DEPENDS? Which could, by the way, also be used to protect comments for packages that depend on glibc. Regards, Arnout > depends on BR2_STATIC_LIBS > > config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_MUSL > -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF