From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:42:20 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 09/16] toolchain-buildroot: don't show musl on noMMU platforms In-Reply-To: <20160318215151.7edc1516@free-electrons.com> References: <1458164602-16983-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1458164602-16983-10-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <56E9EBAE.80508@mind.be> <20160318215151.7edc1516@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <56EC763C.4040003@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 03/18/16 21:51, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Arnout Vandecappelle, > > On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:26:38 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: >> On 03/16/16 22:43, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >>> While musl has recently gained noMMU support for the sh2 platform, we >>> don't support this yet. So for the time being, let's not show musl as >>> an available C library on noMMU platforms. This is for example >>> important on ARM noMMU: ARM is supported by musl, but not its noMMU >>> variants. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni >>> --- >>> toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in | 3 +++ >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in >>> index ea290eb..1fba06b 100644 >>> --- a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in >>> +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in >>> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_MUSL >>> depends on !BR2_powerpc_SPE # not supported, build breaks >>> # Unsupported for MIPS R6 >>> depends on !BR2_mips_32r6 && !BR2_mips_64r6 >>> + # sh2 nommu is supported by musl, but we don't have support >>> + # for it yet in Buildroot. >> >> We don't have support for sh2 at all, and also we used to have it, so I >> wouldn't use 'yet'. Better: we don't have support for sh2 in Buildroot. > > We do have sh2a in the choice of sub-architectures for SuperH: > > config BR2_sh2a > bool "sh2a (SH2A big endian)" > > Whether it works well or not is a different question, but saying that > we don't have support for sh2 at all is not quite correct. Sorry, I thought that sh2a was a distinct architecture from sh2. Never mind then. My Rev-by is already there. Regards, Arnout > > Thomas > -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF