From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:28:44 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] mesa3d: add intel gallium driver support In-Reply-To: <20160331040040.0083ba81@free-electrons.com> References: <1457632891-4354-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <8760wum7dj.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <56E1D44F.70807@zacarias.com.ar> <3979rcxl7o.ln2@ID-313208.user.individual.net> <871t7hjmol.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <56E2A91A.1030509@zacarias.com.ar> <20160331040040.0083ba81@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <56FCFBDC.8010903@zacarias.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 30/03/16 23:00, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > "DRI drivers need X.org" ? This seems wrong, since you precisely sent a > patch recently to all DRI drivers to be built without X.org. > > So I guess this specific patch, allowing to build the unmaintained > Intel Gallium driver is no longer needed? > > I've marked it as Rejected on patchwork for now. Let me know if you > disagree for some reason. > > Thanks! > > Thomas Hi Thomas. The gallium intel driver wasn't cutting it like Bernd said so i tried/investigated the DRI route and it worked out. So yes, even though it might be academically interesting to have the option to build the intel gallium driver it's pretty much useless so no argument from me since i got what was really interesting from the other patchset. Regards.