[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] Add config to nfsd to set number of threads

[Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>]

On 04/15/16 10:37, Andreas Ehmanns wrote:
> Am 26.02.2016 um 00:30 schrieb Arnout Vandecappelle:
>> On 02/25/16 21:40, Andreas Ehmanns wrote:
>>> Yann,
>>> is the patch o.k. for you? Shall I resend it using git?
>>   Yes, please send using git. Patches sent as attachments have an even bigger
>> chance of being ignored than other patches.
>>
>>   However, I can already say that it should be two separate patches: one changing
>> "done" to OK/FAIL, and a second one doing the functional changes.
>>
>>   Regards,
>>   Arnout
>
> Yann, Arnout,
> can someone of you please check what happened with this patch? It's more than
> one month and a half ago that I sent it and it seems that it is still not
> incorporated?

  We are unfortunately swamped with patches that need review, and we don't have 
enough people doing reviews. And we're not willing to forego on quality by 
accepting patches without review.

  We will get to your patches eventually, because they are tracked in patchwork. 
Note that the oldest pending patch is 9 months old, to give you an idea of what 
you can expect.


  What you can do to speed things up:

- Help out with reviewing and testing. Look at some (non-trivial) patches that 
are relevant to you (e.g. affecting a package that you use), download and test 
it, then give it your Tested-by tag. You can also go over the changes, look for 
any mistakes that you can identify, and give feedback or give it your 
Reviewed-by tag. Obviously, your reviews will not immediately carry the same 
weight as those of long-time buildroot developers, but they are really helpful.

- Reply to your patches with 'ping', so they appear on the top of the stack 
again. Note that this doesn't help that much because we're still swamped. But it 
does at least tell us that you will be paying attention if we have any feedback 
to give.


  Regards,
  Arnout

> Is there something from my side what is missing?
>
> Additionally I sent a set of patches for the netsnmp init script one day before
> which are also not incorporated?
> Can you please have a look?
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
>>
>>> Please let me know.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> Am 12.02.2016 um 10:31 schrieb Andreas Ehmanns:
>>>> Yann,
>>>> indeed a killall -9 worked. So I reworked the patch. According to Thomas'
>>>> recommendation I added the OK/FAIL output as done in the dropbox init script.
>>>> Please have a look at the attached patch. If it's o.k., I'll resend it using
>>>> git.
>> [snip]
>>
>

-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle      arnout dot vandecappelle at essensium dot com
Senior Embedded Software Architect . . . . . . +32-478-010353 (mobile)
Essensium, Mind division . . . . . . . . . . . . . . http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium . . . . . BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF