From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] arch/x86: remove support for i386
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:27:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57155148.9030702@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460928694-22593-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
On 04/17/16 23:31, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> The Linux kernel doesn't even support i386 anymore, there is no NPTL
> support for i386 and uClibc-ng only supports NPTL on x86, so there is
> essentially no usable thread implementation. Most likely glibc and
> musl also don't support i386 either. So it's time to remove the
> support for this architecture variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
[snip]
> diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-external/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-external/Config.in
> index ff759a0..d6f57a1 100644
> --- a/toolchain/toolchain-external/Config.in
> +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-external/Config.in
> @@ -615,8 +615,7 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_MUSL_CROSS
> bool "Musl 1.1.12 toolchain (experimental)"
> depends on (BR2_arm && BR2_ARM_EABI) || \
> (BR2_arm && BR2_ARM_EABIHF && !BR2_ARM_CPU_ARMV4) || \
With this patch I notice this... Huh? AFAIK ARMv4 cannot have VFPv2, so it
can't be EABIhf, right? I guess, Thomas, that you just blindly set this because
the EABIhf version of the toolchain is ARMv5, without realizing that it's ARMv5
because EABIhf doesn't exist for v4?
Regards,
Arnout
> - (BR2_armeb && BR2_ARM_EABI) || \
> - (BR2_i386 && !BR2_x86_i386) || \
> + (BR2_armeb && BR2_ARM_EABI) || BR2_i386 || \
> (BR2_mips && !BR2_SOFT_FLOAT) || \
> BR2_mipsel || (BR2_powerpc && BR2_powerpc_CLASSIC) || \
> BR2_sh4 || BR2_sh4eb || \
>
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-18 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-17 21:31 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] arch/x86: remove support for i386 Thomas Petazzoni
2016-04-18 21:27 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2016-04-18 21:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-04-18 21:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57155148.9030702@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox