From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau?= Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:28:40 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Buildroot] libmad and AVR32 optimisations In-Reply-To: <87y5eigchn.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <771436318.25518.1361402063381.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> <87621mhs7d.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <87y5eigchn.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <59153487.35651.1361449720550.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Peter Korsgaard, all, On Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:58:12 AM, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > >>>>> "Simon" == Simon Dawson writes: > > Simon> On 21 February 2013 10:33, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > >> Or simply get rid of the huge patch - It's just an optimization, and not > >> really needed, right? > > Simon> The problem is that, for libmad to be usable on avr32, this > Simon> optimization patch really *is* needed. > > Ok, then lets fix it up instead. To fix it up, you can check if libmad is provided with the ASF: http://www.atmel.com/tools/AVRSOFTWAREFRAMEWORK.aspx If so, it may have been cleaned up since the BuildRoot patch, so generate a new patch from the ASF against mainline libmad, and retest. Best regards, Beno?t