From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jorge S. Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:08:22 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Dataflash rootfs problems (still) In-Reply-To: <1193266654.4415.21.camel@aeglos.sweden.atmel.com> References: <6090c5eb0710240920o4e56f66et2c9f1761c97aea4e@mail.gmail.com> <1193243618.4415.6.camel@aeglos.sweden.atmel.com> <6090c5eb0710240954q368b3409k282c02a5e2fcbef4@mail.gmail.com> <471F904A.5050206@promwad.com> <1193266654.4415.21.camel@aeglos.sweden.atmel.com> Message-ID: <6090c5eb0710250208i4e48840dub7674ec4ba3fdb2@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net 2007/10/25, Ulf Samuelsson : > > ons 2007-10-24 klockan 21:34 +0300 skrev Ivan Kuten: > > > > > > During the 1st boot, Dropbear creates and "writes" the generated keys, > maybe > > > is this *write* operation the one screwing up the dataflash? > > > > > > > We have similar problems with Dataflash&RM9200 > > *write* operation is unreliable - we had corrupted filesystem after > reboot. > > Our solution was to use r/o only on dataflash. > > > > I would reduce speed to 5 Mbps or lower. or implement the external gate. > Moving to the AT91SAM9260 is of course a nice alternative. > Lower cost, (soon) much higher speed (with the AT91SAM9260A) > Better BootROM (I defined it :-) Can you suggest the best way to reduce speed? maybe using the board definition on the kernel? Regards, Jorge. > > > Best regards, > > Ivan > > -------------------------------- > > Embedded Linux engineer, > > Promwad Company: http://www.promwad.com/ > > Homepage : http://www.ivankuten.com/ > > -------------------------------- > -- > Best Regards, > Ulf Samuelsson > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://busybox.net/lists/buildroot/attachments/20071025/7318add6/attachment.htm