From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A24C433EF for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:32:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E7840BB0; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:32:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ygAZUxXO0u8X; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3253540BA0; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619D11BF951 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1C141980 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:32:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r4GOaJ0PZLe0 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:32:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B0604197F for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:32:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id j8so32555pll.11 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:32:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2okEuoKmTyK34X7tAXTynJwLtsoAopluMsdu/vyAjn4=; b=esY64czVuIyBwc45wZ9Xd8mQKy5yvhgkYn5TVZ3EToj581ZRQUIE91VigNG6GFdUSj wBoDyFiPpIIQF6NoKDipE/arfIwr+0O8IH+CAplbVrSSmb5qd7LOVDEI5HphI27THBNi 6YJO03vBdYakzIk9dTuGVGZPERyNbijgC/Pyl48kTd6VQjSbKxJdMBcyfakpEP7PxJAr VZlMy7PKadG9RtSgCBjnSQR1BwB0aiumVqsFWWCqwNaTJNMEpm0eN82yEtDzXCggxHjz z5tCMkvDkQ54NK+McqW7wdM/y0RVwX90BZ++CelssWa8sEtJnneCKIrkHDlAKf0k0qpr W1TA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2okEuoKmTyK34X7tAXTynJwLtsoAopluMsdu/vyAjn4=; b=DOrooBT/qpbLOJC/clwJz95iCR3WhCObhzLqln03fMVM9p/lDQhRMgJykNcVhCbx2H oSrV0ETb0kapBsqCEhiwSYPPIa4hEAzhCBQbDTsrq1aHmJEVI7maR7y9b7WfDrYS8M9j /rvtYqE2zGmkafIsjwi8yN2SrNZmZ90Gqg7NrIF82LZK/AQtXrZABXb2RgLlDhC26Ntw 0JiNx5tqnV3haLznUxZL+5vbZIP80SWL4IM7OdhaJGZAXK2BJBv0EvAvWWqToZJvyXmF uWt+lkId0nR4Kfdp+FoBwHAOFpf6rCdxGkHzyzHIJzL0BIq5eBK4OMV8f2d+VSZQMl/a x1uQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bprzdvSnlRZINW9fxSXtI+LlPBSDau8JH0YD73Bnl9rvH0ecT xE5rDKONkk6SDL2k4Jgiji0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTUFDpo0dKVU+oPs06OkgNR+APlpU5W8RWzyHAvYU4kpj5GF9naBO+jCwJ9tm31bYnP02zRQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:213:b0:156:7efe:4783 with SMTP id r19-20020a170903021300b001567efe4783mr25582864plh.126.1651012366393; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.67.48.245] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s22-20020a17090ad49600b001cd4989fee1sm4097611pju.45.2022.04.26.15.32.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6422cb5a-913c-88e4-16b2-aa27bb5a3ddc@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:32:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Petazzoni References: <20220426173211.64840-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20220426173211.64840-2-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20220426204233.77ed8bc5@windsurf> From: Florian Fainelli In-Reply-To: <20220426204233.77ed8bc5@windsurf> Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/2] toolchain/Config.in: add BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_12 blind option X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: opendmb@gmail.com, mmayer@broadcom.com, buildroot@buildroot.org, "Yann E. MORIN" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hi Thomas, On 4/26/22 11:42, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello Florian, > > Thanks for the patch! I hope you're doing well :-) Doing alright thanks for asking. > > On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 10:32:10 -0700 > Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> In order to add gcc 12 support for internal and external toolchain >> in follow-up commits, introduce BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_12 symbol. >> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli >> --- >> toolchain/Config.in | 11 +++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/toolchain/Config.in b/toolchain/Config.in >> index d2c81217c84a..b572a89f2f85 100644 >> --- a/toolchain/Config.in >> +++ b/toolchain/Config.in >> @@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_GCC_BUG_43744 >> depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_8 || \ >> BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_9 || \ >> BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_10 || \ >> - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_11 >> + BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_11 || \ >> + BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_12 >> >> # https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63261. This bug no >> # longer exists in gcc 8.x. >> @@ -150,7 +151,8 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_GCC_BUG_68485 >> config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_GCC_BUG_83143 >> bool >> default y if BR2_sh >> - depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_10 || BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_11 >> + depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_10 || BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_11 || \ >> + BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_12 > > Did you verify that these two bugs still affected gcc 12.x ? The bug tracker entry for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744 does not seem to show a resolution for this bug so I am assuming that it is still active since it was not fixed in GCC 11. Similarly it seemed like https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83143 was still not quite fixed. Do you read the comments differently? -- Florian _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot