[Buildroot] [RFC 4/4] board/acmesystems/aria-g25: set BR2_GENIMAGE_CFG_FILES

["Étienne Phélip" <etienne.phelip@savoirfairelinux.com>]

Good morning everyone,

----- Le 5 Avr 17, ? 12:14, Thomas Petazzoni thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com a ?crit :

> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 17:02:36 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> 
>>  Combined with the other discussion in this thread, long-term I see us evolving
>> towards:
>> 
>> - deprecate some of the finer-grain fs tuning options we have now;
>> - always using genimage to generate the target filesystems;
>> - position our fs targets more as a 'quick fix' solution than for production;
>> - make host-e2fsprogs etc. blind options again.
> 
> To be honest, I am not sure I share this long-term view. I like the way
> things are done today, very modular: we can generate just a filesystem
> image, optionally use genimage afterwards, etc. So the "always using
> genimage to generate the target filesystem" is not something that I see
> as an improvement, for example.

To sum things up:
 - Should I add BR2_GENIMAGE_CFG_FILES or reuse the script in the
postimage script
 - if BR2_GENIMAGE_CFG_FILES is choosen, should it 'depends on' or
'select' BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_GENIMAGE?
 - should I convert all boards or just the one already in this RFC?

Best regards
-Etienne