Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Olivain via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
To: Marcus Hoffmann <buildroot@bubu1.eu>
Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org,
	James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>,
	Manuel Diener <manuel.diener@oss.othermo.de>,
	Oli Vogt <oli.vogt.pub01@gmail.com>,
	Marcus Hoffmann <bubu@bubu1.eu>
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/python-django: security bump to 6.0.4
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:10:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d47a2885ab05603e4f4a597670664bf@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260422215427.186961-1-buildroot@bubu1.eu>

On 22/04/2026 23:54, Marcus Hoffmann via buildroot wrote:
> Django 6.0.4 fixes one security issue with severity “moderate”, four
> security issues with severity “low”, and several bugs in 6.0.3.
> 
> Security issues:
> * CVE-2026-3902: ASGI header spoofing via underscore/hyphen conflation
>     ASGIRequest normalizes header names following WSGI conventions, 
> mapping
>     hyphens to underscores. As a result, even in configurations where
>     reverse proxies carefully strip security-sensitive headers named 
> with
>     hyphens, such a header could be spoofed by supplying a header named 
> with
>     underscores.
> 
>     Under WSGI, it is the responsibility of the server or proxy to 
> avoid
>     ambiguous mappings. (Django’s runserver was patched in CVE 
> 2015-0219.)
>     But under ASGI, there is not the same uniform expectation, even if 
> many
>     proxies protect against this under default configuration (including
>     nginx via underscores_in_headers off;).
> 
>     Headers containing underscores are now ignored by ASGIRequest, 
> matching
>     the behavior of Daphne, the reference server for ASGI.
> 
>     This issue has severity “low” according to the Django security 
> policy.
> 
> * CVE-2026-4277: Privilege abuse in GenericInlineModelAdmin¶
> 
>     Add permissions on inline model instances were not validated on
>     submission of forged POST data in GenericInlineModelAdmin.
> 
>     This issue has severity “low” according to the Django security 
> policy.
> 
> * CVE-2026-4292: Privilege abuse in ModelAdmin.list_editable¶
> 
>     Admin changelist forms using list_editable incorrectly allowed new
>     instances to be created via forged POST data.
> 
>     This issue has severity “low” according to the Django security 
> policy.
> 
> * CVE-2026-33033: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in
>     MultiPartParser via base64-encoded file upload¶
> 
>     When using django.http.multipartparser.MultiPartParser, multipart
>     uploads with Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 that include 
> excessive
>     whitespace may trigger repeated memory copying, potentially 
> degrading
>     performance.
> 
>     This issue has severity “moderate” according to the Django security 
> policy.
> 
> * CVE-2026-33034: Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in
>     ASGI requests via memory upload limit bypass¶
> 
>     ASGI requests with a missing or understated Content-Length header 
> could
>     bypass the DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE limit when reading
>     HttpRequest.body, potentially loading an unbounded request body 
> into
>     memory and causing service degradation.
> 
>     This issue has severity “low” according to the Django security 
> policy.
> 
> Bugfixes:
> * Fixed a regression in Django 6.0 where alogin() and alogout() did not
>   respectively set or clear request.user if it had already been
>   materialized (e.g., by sync middleware) (#37017).
> * Fixed a regression in Django 6.0 in admin forms where
>   RelatedFieldWidgetWrapper incorrectly wrapped all widgets in a
>   <fieldset> (#36949).
> * Fixed a bug in Django 6.0 where the fields.E348 system check did not
>   detect name clashes between model managers and related_names for
>   non-self-referential relationships (#36973).
> 
> Release Notes:
> https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/6.0/releases/6.0.4/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcus Hoffmann <buildroot@bubu1.eu>

Applied to master, thanks.
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-23 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-22 21:54 [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/python-django: security bump to 6.0.4 Marcus Hoffmann via buildroot
2026-04-23 19:10 ` Julien Olivain via buildroot [this message]
2026-05-04 14:48 ` Thomas Perale via buildroot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6d47a2885ab05603e4f4a597670664bf@free.fr \
    --to=buildroot@buildroot.org \
    --cc=bubu@bubu1.eu \
    --cc=buildroot@bubu1.eu \
    --cc=james.hilliard1@gmail.com \
    --cc=ju.o@free.fr \
    --cc=manuel.diener@oss.othermo.de \
    --cc=oli.vogt.pub01@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox