From: "Jérôme Pouiller" <jezz@sysmic.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] toolchain/crosstool-NG: do not depend on the top-level Buildroot's .config
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 00:32:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8003334.zUx8i8rUNE@sagittae> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363644183-29242-1-git-send-email-yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Hello Yann,
On Monday 18 March 2013 23:03:03 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Previously, the crosstool-NG backend did depend on the top-level
> Buildroot's .config to detect changes in the toolchain options,
> using a tentatively-clever heuristic, which also included the full
> Buildroot's version string to push down to set the components' versions
> strings.
>
> In doing so, any commit in the Buildroot tree would imply a complete
> rebuild of the toolchain, even in the case the toolchain options did
> not change, thus being a large annoyance (to say the least).
>
> As Buildroot never guaranteed that toolchain options would be detected,
> even less handled, and that the internal backend does neither detect nor
> act on toolchain options changes, and delegate that to the user, there
> is no point in individualising the crosstool-NG backend's behaviour.
>
> This reasoning also applies to the depdency on the crosstool-NG's bundled
> .config file, too.
>
> So, just drop the not-so-clever heuristic, and just build the toolchain
> once, leaving to the user the responsibility to explictly ask Buildroot
> to rebuild the toolchain.
Hmmm... I didn't followed all debate, and I am sorry if this suggestion has
already been submitted but, why not depend on
build/buildroot-config/br2/toolchain/ctng* ?
BR,
--
J?r?me Pouiller, Sysmic
Embedded Linux specialist
http://www.sysmic.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-08 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-18 22:03 [Buildroot] [PATCH] toolchain/crosstool-NG: do not depend on the top-level Buildroot's .config Yann E. MORIN
2013-03-18 22:17 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-05-08 22:32 ` Jérôme Pouiller [this message]
2013-05-09 8:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-14 18:44 Yann E. MORIN
2013-03-15 0:08 ` Przemyslaw Wrzos
2013-03-15 17:52 ` Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8003334.zUx8i8rUNE@sagittae \
--to=jezz@sysmic.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox