From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] rpi-wifi-firmware: new package
Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 10:50:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871ss2s717.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170506082758.GD2934@scaer> (Yann E. MORIN's message of "Sat, 6 May 2017 10:27:58 +0200")
>>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> writes:
> Peter, All,
> On 2017-05-05 20:37 +0200, Peter Korsgaard spake thusly:
>> Add firmware (NVRAM data) for the Raspberry Pi 3 and Zero W wifi module.
>>
>> Notice that linux-firmware provides the main firmware
>> (brcmfmac43430-sdio.bin), but the module also needs board specific
>> configuration (NVRAM) data.
>>
>> For the rpi, this data is available in the RPI firmware-nonfree git repo.
>> As this repo contains a lot of unrelated data (~70MB), simply download the
>> single NVRAM file instead of cloning the entire repo.
>>
>> A similar approach is used by openwrt and opensuse:
>>
>> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/package/firmware/brcmfmac43430-firmware/Makefile?rev=49139
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/hardware/bcm43xx-firmware/bcm43xx-firmware.spec?rev=b1628448b36c85abc9215eab4785ef29
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
> [--SNIP--]
>> diff --git a/package/rpi-wifi-firmware/Config.in b/package/rpi-wifi-firmware/Config.in
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000..2c87c7584
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/package/rpi-wifi-firmware/Config.in
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +config BR2_PACKAGE_RPI_WIFI_FIRMWARE
>> + bool "rpi-wifi-firmware"
>> + depends on BR2_arm || BR2_aarch64
> I know it read "rpi-wifi-firmware" and thus it is arm or aarch64. But
> can we expect the same chip to be used on a non-arm board?
Posssibly, yes - But then with different nvram settings. See the
opensuse link above for how they handle rpi + a few sunxi boards.
> I would just drop the architecture dependency here, because there is
> nothing specific to the SoC here; the WiFi chip is a secondary chip, so
> could well be present on other boards that are non-arm.
I disagree. I haven't found any detailed documentation, but my
understanding is that this nvram data is board(-family) specific,
E.G. it differs between the sunxi boards. From what I could find, the
rpi0-w uses the same nvram file as rpi3 though.
>> +++ b/package/rpi-wifi-firmware/rpi-wifi-firmware.mk
>> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
>> +################################################################################
>> +#
>> +# rpi-wifi-firmware
>> +#
>> +################################################################################
>> +
>> +RPI_WIFI_FIRMWARE_VERSION = 54bab3d6a6d43239c71d26464e6e10e5067ffea7
>> +# brcmfmac43430-sdio.bin comes from linux-firmware
>> +RPI_WIFI_FIRMWARE_SOURCE = brcmfmac43430-sdio.txt
>> +# git repo contains a lot of unrelated files
>> +RPI_WIFI_FIRMWARE_SITE =
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RPi-Distro/firmware-nonfree/$(RPI_WIFI_FIRMWARE_VERSION)/brcm80211/brcm
> License?
Yeah, that's where things get complicated. There is no explicit license
given. The other brcm*bin files in linux-firmware are covered by
LICENCE.broadcom_bcm43xx, but the question is if this also applies to
this nvram file.
Maybe we should just do:
RPI_WIFI_FIRMWARE_LICENSE = PROPRIETARY
Like we do for the bluetooth part.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-06 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-05 18:37 [Buildroot] [PATCH] rpi-wifi-firmware: new package Peter Korsgaard
2017-05-06 8:27 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-05-06 8:50 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2017-05-06 9:10 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-05-06 9:28 ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-05-06 9:34 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-05-06 9:35 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871ss2s717.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk \
--to=peter@korsgaard.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox