From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:04:02 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] New package: kmod In-Reply-To: <201201180000.22317.arnout@mind.be> (Arnout Vandecappelle's message of "Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:21 +0100") References: <1326726276-8442-1-git-send-email-yegorslists@googlemail.com> <87ty3upg82.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <201201180000.22317.arnout@mind.be> Message-ID: <871uqyorrx.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle writes: Arnout> On Tuesday 17 January 2012 23:13:08 Yegor Yefremov wrote: >> As we came to this topic, what is your opinion on adding /run? It also >> became udev's dependency. Arnout> IIRC /run basically replaces /var/run in Fedora, Debian, SuSE Arnout> and others. Since we anyway symlink /var/run to /tmp, we can Arnout> easily do the same for /run. That's my understanding as well. I don't have any issues with adding a /run symlink to fs/skeleton. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard