From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] External toolchain: crosstool-NG instead of buildroot?
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:06:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871vioytvz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912202237.58730.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> (Yann E. MORIN's message of "Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:37:58 +0100")
>>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> writes:
Hi,
Yann> Hello Peter, and All!
Yann> On Sunday 20 December 2009 20:50:09 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> we had some discussion about working
>> closer together with the crosstool-NG people, E.G. long term perhaps
>> getting rid of toolchain building in BR, and simply use crosstool-NG for
>> it.
Yann> As you mentioned the subject, I think we should prepare both
Yann> projects so crosstool-NG offers all that buildroot needs, and
Yann> maybe tweak a few things in buildroot to efficiently use
Yann> crostool-NG.
Yes definately - Yann, I'm really sorry that I haven't gotten back to
you on your mail from ELCE - Things have been kind of crazy here, but
now holidays are coming up.
Yann> The plans for crosstool-NG are a ~4-month release cycle, as 3
Yann> months is too short for me alone to handle. I think I can adapt
Yann> the release cycle to more closely follow buildroot. In fact, I
Yann> think that, to be efficient, crosstool-NG should be released one
Yann> month ahead of buildroot, so that potential bugs can be fixed and
Yann> a bug-fix release can be made just before the buildroot
Yann> release. That way, buildroot can rely on an as-stable-as-
Yann> possible release. Next crosstool-NG release is due for late
Yann> January, so that should be a match for the next buildroot
Yann> (planned February, I guess).
Yes, that sounds good. Why is a 3 month release schedule significantly
more work than a 4 month one? It should just mean less new development
done per release.
Yann> Apart form that, we could build upon the results of the BR
Yann> developper day. Should I repost my summary to this list?
Yes please do.
Talking about developers day, Thomas and me are trying to arrange
another dev day after FOSDEM (February 8) - Anyone interested?
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-21 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-18 13:00 [Buildroot] External toolchain: crosstool-NG instead of buildroot? Grant Edwards
2009-12-18 21:31 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2009-12-18 21:36 ` Grant Edwards
2009-12-20 19:50 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-12-20 21:37 ` Yann E. MORIN
2009-12-21 20:06 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2009-12-21 22:10 ` Yann E. MORIN
2009-12-22 7:54 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871vioytvz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk \
--to=jacmet@uclibc.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox