From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:42:30 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Still no answer for a contribution made in March In-Reply-To: <20080612095933.25f3345e@crazy> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Thu\, 12 Jun 2008 09\:59\:33 +0200") References: <20080611161156.33737116@crazy> <46a136670806110808x737929a4red33f32c593ae6e2@mail.gmail.com> <20080611154121.GI3795@mx.loc> <20080612095933.25f3345e@crazy> Message-ID: <871w33doy1.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: Hi, >> Yea, and that's the reason why the svn-repo is completely fux0red up. Thomas> I don't necessarly think so. Here, the issue is not a bottleneck at the Thomas> commit level, but rather a patch review bandwidth problem. Agree - And lack of testing before stuff gets checked in. The deeper issue is that we don't do releases I guess, so there's a tension between doing development, and having something stable for actual use. I have gotten a login to the gcc cluster, and have plans to setup a buildbot instance to do regression tests on buildroot. Thomas> What's the relationship between your Git repo and the Thomas> official Subversion tree ? When is your tree pulled into the Thomas> official Subversion tree ? Who review the patches and when ? Bernard's git tree is a fork of the svn repo from some time ago. There's no official sync, but he sometimes cherrypicks commits from svn, and I sometimes do the same from his tree. It's a pity, but has historical reasons. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard