From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:06:16 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] musl: Honor BR2_STATIC_LIBS /
	BR2_SHARED_LIBS
In-Reply-To: <20151018183347.06045571@free-electrons.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's
 message of "Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:33:47 +0200")
References: <1444796977-23004-1-git-send-email-chaduffy@cisco.com>
 <20151018150918.7db2cc07@free-electrons.com>
 <20151018155838.GE3583@free.fr>
 <CAEHm_sjfxGkfvzvi=y-Mq+xGdOObGyKLfgfbO0g2MN+kCNUteg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151018183347.06045571@free-electrons.com>
Message-ID: <8737x89etz.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:

 > Charles, Yann,
 > On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:18:10 +0000, Charles Duffy wrote:
 >> I provided this patch because my build results were unnecessarily enlarged
 >> by dynamic libraries on an otherwise static-only system.
 >> 
 >> It sounds to me like we could optionally disable only dynamic libraries;
 >> leave static libraries always enabled; and end up in a place that works for
 >> everyone.

 > Yeah, that's also my thought. In uClibc, you can enable/disable the
 > shared library build, but not the static library build. So maybe we
 > should do:

 > 	--enable-static \
 > 	$(if $(BR2_STATIC_LIBS),--disable-shared,--enable-shared)

 > I.e, always static, and shared as soon as BR2_STATIC_LIBS is disabled.

Yes, I think that's the safest/easiest/best-matching-the-other-libcs
approach.

-- 
Venlig hilsen,
Peter Korsgaard