[Buildroot] [PATCH 2/5] zsh: security bump to version 5.0.7

[Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>]

>>>>> "Gustavo" == Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> writes:

Hi,

 >> Same comment as for dash, who should "win" the /bin/sh symlink?
 >> 
 >> maybe busybox -> dash -> zsh -> bash?

 > Forgot to cc the list ;)

Ups, apparently - Sorry.

 > It's not really/only a matter of which one wins, it's an init system
 > nightmare that i'm solving.
 > Say you've got:

 > busybox-init + some better shell = the better shell should win.

Agreed.

 > sysvinit + busybox + some better shell = same as above

Agreed.

 > sysvinit + no busybox + some better shell = oops since there's no /bin/sh

As long as all shells install a /bin/sh (symlink), that should be fine -
But it should also be reproducible, so with a fixed priority.

 > I don't care which of the better is "betterer", it's pretty subjective,
 > i just want the crazy combinations to work :)
 > Of course there's sysvinit + no busybox + no shell but that's another
 > problem.

Such a setup is pretty unlikely to ever happen on purpose imho.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard