From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:20:46 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Fix naming mismatch between directfb and kernel on "fusion" version numbers In-Reply-To: <4A6C2534.3000503@atmel.com> (Ulf Samuelsson's message of "Sun\, 26 Jul 2009 11\:43\:16 +0200") References: <4A6BE6A8.9080400@atmel.com> <87k51vsxz0.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <4A6C2534.3000503@atmel.com> Message-ID: <874oszshqp.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Samuelsson writes: Hi, >> But aren't those kernel modules part of directfb? If not, does >> stuff actually work (not just build) if you workaround this >> version incompatibility? Wouldn't it make more sense to fix where >> the define is set in the first place? Have you sent this by the >> directfb developers? >> Ulf> As far as I see, the major/minor version numbers provided Ulf> are the same as requested, but the naming is different. OK, what driver / setup exactly? Isn't the problem just that we need to bump the linux-fusion package version? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard