From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:44:56 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] problem building openswan using svn-buildroot In-Reply-To: <20090223143319.GA6299@cbg.dyndns.org> (Steffen Schulz's message of "Mon\, 23 Feb 2009 15\:33\:19 +0100") References: <499E05A7.2070403@unix-beratung.de> <87bpsv6ik4.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <49A17E91.7060104@unix-beratung.de> <87y6vy5okv.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20090223102825.GB31413@cbg.dyndns.org> <87hc2l2yns.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20090223143319.GA6299@cbg.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <874oyl2own.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Steffen" == Steffen Schulz writes: >> Ok, anyone wants to step up and support openswan/strongswan? >> Otherwise I think our users are better off if we remove the >> package. Steffen> I just updated a package I made a few months ago. It Steffen> compiles and binaries seem to work, but I can not test it Steffen> right now. Ok. Steffen> BTW, it happened the second time now that I could not use the most Steffen> recent version of a program because the libtool patch won't apply. Steffen> I used the most recent strongswan version that seems to work. Steffen> The other package this happened with is gnutls > 2.4.2. Yes, I've seen that as well. I think we need to come up with a more robust way of handling the libtool stuff than blindly trying to apply a patch to whatever version the package includes. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard