From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:30:07 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] What's up with the kernel names? (Again) In-Reply-To: (Ulf Samuelsson's message of "Fri\, 6 Feb 2009 10\:06\:29 +0100") References: <873aeue676.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <87vdrpaug2.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <1233866252.4148.12.camel@elrond.atmel.com> <1233900994.26426.10.camel@elrond.atmel.com> <871vucar1o.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <874oz7agts.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Samuelsson writes: Ulf> So they are broken for people using the simple linux build already? Ulf> ==> The previous default was to use the advanced build, if my memory Ulf> does not fail me. For certain atmel boards, yes. Ulf> No, lets not add any more clutter to binaries/ Ulf> ==> If you do not like that solution, then letting people that Ulf> want uImage , build the simple linux would work for me. Ulf> But your opinion seems to be that you want to do things Ulf> in a certain way, and you want to ensure that noone Ulf> can do it in a different way, regardless if their use case Ulf> is different from yours. Sigh, we are talking about making the name configurable, instead of the current hardcoded settings. I don't see where that takes away any functionality from your use cases? It's the current setup that forces certain ways of doing stuff. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard