From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 09:32:01 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] CHANGES: fix missing "binutils" in 2019.05-rc1 description In-Reply-To: <20190509065155.21279-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Thu, 9 May 2019 08:51:54 +0200") References: <20190509065155.21279-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Message-ID: <875zqkhymm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni > --- > CHANGES | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > diff --git a/CHANGES b/CHANGES > index 6fb63479ee..fb9e2e70c5 100644 > --- a/CHANGES > +++ b/CHANGES > @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ > not just when not available on the build host. > Toolchain: Glibc bumped to 2.29, musl bumped to 1.1.22, > - binutils 2.32 added, 2.28/2.29 removed, default changed to > - 2.31.1. > + binutils 2.32 added, binutils 2.28/2.29 removed, default > + changed to 2.31.1. I actually did this on purpose as the entire line is about binutils, so it is implied for the removed / default part. But I don't really feel strongly about it. If you find this way clearer then feel free to apply. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard