From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:33:26 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] libmad and AVR32 optimisations In-Reply-To: <771436318.25518.1361402063381.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau=22's?= message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:14:23 +0100 (CET)") References: <771436318.25518.1361402063381.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> Message-ID: <87621mhs7d.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Beno?t" == Beno?t Th?baudeau writes: >> [1] package/libmad/libmad-0.15.1b-optimization.patch.avr32 Beno?t> This patch was clearly made for specific libmad Beno?t> settings. Rather than fixing it, it would be easier to simply Beno?t> add a "depends on !BR2_avr32" to the config options that fail Beno?t> on AVR32. Or simply get rid of the huge patch - It's just an optimization, and not really needed, right? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard