From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:32:50 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] commiting patches In-Reply-To: <20110103090853.5168f221@surf> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Mon, 3 Jan 2011 09:08:53 +0100") References: <20101230063005.15755osot9w5qwco@www.home.zuerker.org> <8739pfhtgk.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20110103090853.5168f221@surf> Message-ID: <8762u6crpp.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: Thomas> Hello, Thomas> As this is my first message to the list in 2011: happy new year Thomas> everybody. Best wishes for 2011, and let's have some good BR Thomas> development during this year :-) Yeah! >> I mainly try to handle the patches in fifo mode, but I do also skim >> new mails. This is both because sometimes updates are sent, and >> sometimes I see trivial patches that can be handled when I have 5 >> min spare or important bugfixes. Thomas> I think there is also one criteria that has an impact of the Thomas> time it takes for a patch to be applied: what the patch Thomas> does. If the patch is a relatively simple fix to a package, a Thomas> new package, or something that doesn't have any major impact of Thomas> Buildroot's infrastructure, or Buildroot usage, then this patch Thomas> is likely to be handled/merged sooner than something that has Thomas> broader impact. Indeed, that's what I meant when I wrote about trivial patches. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard