From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 23:02:53 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] linux-headers: bump 4.10.x and 3.2.x series In-Reply-To: <20170303235015.39cde563@free-electrons.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Fri, 3 Mar 2017 23:50:15 +0100") References: <20170302123357.1274-1-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <20170303235015.39cde563@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <877f44g0oi.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: > Hello, > On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:33:56 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias >> --- >> package/linux-headers/Config.in.host | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Both applied, thanks. Peter: I'm not sure which policy you want to have > in the LTS with regard to bumping kernel/kernel-headers versions, for > already supported branches. I'm also not sure what the best approach is. If we do bump the version, then what about other packages doing bugfix-only version bumps (E.G. busybox, ..) -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard