From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:52:34 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 5/7] psmisc: bump to version 22.16 In-Reply-To: <863cdef0cedcf207977015eeec5c8357@zacarias.com.ar> (Gustavo Zacarias's message of "Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:37:45 -0300") References: <1332987903-12378-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <1332987903-12378-5-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <87sjgrdq3g.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <90ff39765efa093002706980f59b4233@zacarias.com.ar> <87fwcqe4ti.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <863cdef0cedcf207977015eeec5c8357@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <877gy2e265.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Gustavo" == Gustavo Zacarias writes: Hi, Gustavo> Shouldn't we push -fstack-protector into CFLAGS in the toolchain infra Gustavo> when the option is enabled? Gustavo> AFAIK if you build stack protector support without using a form of Gustavo> -fstack-protector* in CFLAGS then the packages won't use it, right? Gustavo> And if we leave it to each package to do it then we're just giving a Gustavo> false sense of security with that option. Gustavo> On a side note, avahi is forcing stack protector off too since Gustavo> memorial times, maybe that should be revised? Yes, I also think our SSP support could be improved. Anyone knows / cares enough of it to do so? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard