From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:01:39 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/toolchain/gcc In-Reply-To: <20080619003821.GB18139@cloud.net.au> (Hamish Moffatt's message of "Thu\, 19 Jun 2008 10\:38\:21 +1000") References: <20080618154649.BB6FB3C6C1@busybox.net> <20080619003821.GB18139@cloud.net.au> Message-ID: <877iclykks.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Hamish" == Hamish Moffatt writes: Hamish> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 08:46:49AM -0700, jacmet at uclibc.org wrote: >> Author: jacmet >> Date: 2008-06-18 08:46:48 -0700 (Wed, 18 Jun 2008) >> New Revision: 22430 >> >> Log: >> toolchain/gcc: use $(@D) Hamish> Umm that's not very descriptive :) What does $(@D) do and why is it Hamish> preferable to the previous value? $(@D) is the directory part of the target, and it's preferable for the same reason we are replacing explicit target names with $@. Would you rather have a commit message like: toolchain/gcc: misc cleanup ? It's not really important, but I'm running though the changes Bernhard has made to toolchain/gcc as I'm going to take the 4.3.x patches, and I'm applying the trivial fixes I see. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard