From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 21:45:25 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] sunxi-boards: set a default board In-Reply-To: <20130605213807.0c015c5d@skate> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Wed, 5 Jun 2013 21:38:07 +0200") References: <1370449270-22014-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1370449270-22014-2-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <87d2s0cqtw.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20130605213807.0c015c5d@skate> Message-ID: <878v2ocpey.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: >> Hmm, how is this different that what we do for the barebox/u-boot/linux >> configurations? Thomas> It is different in that this package starts with BR2_PACKAGE, Thomas> so it can get selected by the randpackageconfig logic, while Thomas> barebox/u-boot/linux Kconfig options don't start by Thomas> BR2_PACKAGE, so they don't get selected by randpackageconfig :) True, but we have the same problem with E.G. BR2_PACKAG E_QT_LICENSE_APPROVED / BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE_LICENSE_APPROVED. If these are not set the build will also get stuck, so we preseed them in the autobuilders (I do atleast). >> Wouldn't it make more sense to blacklist the package or preseed >> BR2_PACKAGE_SUNXI_BOARDS_FEX_FILE to a sensible value in the autobuilder >> scripts? Thomas> Ok, will do that. Will you also do the same on your Thomas> autobuilders? I really should clean up my script, and share it Thomas> so that we can try to run the same logic. Yes, I'll fixup "mine" as well. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard