From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:50:06 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Gaisler sparc-leon In-Reply-To: <20100903091327.v01tegjghcqso4oo@webmail.bluegenesis.com> (konrad@gaisler.com's message of "Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:13:27 -0400") References: <20100903091327.v01tegjghcqso4oo@webmail.bluegenesis.com> Message-ID: <878w3ivq3l.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "konrad" == konrad writes: Hi, konrad> My shortterm goal is to get buildroot to build a linux image konrad> with romfs that includes libc shared and some more advanced app konrad> like a ssh. That should cover/test already a lot konrad> functionality. So far in snapgear 2.0 we only used uClibc konrad> static, we had made quite a few patches to uclibc, didnt submit konrad> them to the uclibc though. It was also a fairly old uclibc that konrad> we used, it seems that uclibc has gotten better in the meantime konrad> (while we sticked still to the old version...). I think that if konrad> Gaisler would switch to buildroot and Leon users would start konrad> using it the sparc the sparc part would be maintained and konrad> running.I'll press this now and will post my results Ok, good - Shared linking on sparc indeed used to be broken as far as I remember. konrad> Ps: Note at the side: If no hardware is available the konrad> evaluation version of the sparcleon simulator called TSIM can konrad> be used, so that non sparc users can run/test/verify too. ? What about something a bit more standard like qemu-system-sparc? We're already using qemu to test E.G. arm. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard