From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:22:57 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] arch support In-Reply-To: <20090112090745.GB25148@mx.loc> (Bernhard Reutner-Fischer's message of "Mon\, 12 Jan 2009 10\:07\:45 +0100") References: <87ljtgj44z.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20090112090745.GB25148@mx.loc> Message-ID: <878wpgj2tq.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Bernhard" == Bernhard Reutner-Fischer writes: Hi, >> Status: >> >> alpha: broken in libpthread Bernhard> alpha currently only supports static builds and no threads, IIRC. Ok, I'll fixup Kconfig deps then. >> arm: ok >> armeb: ok >> avr32: ok (uclibc-0.9.29-avr32, binutils-2.17-avr32, gcc-4.2.2-avr32) >> cris: broken in kernel headers Bernhard> This was already fixed, build tested fine for me some time ago. I'll try your tree and port over fixes if needed. >> m68k: gcc ICE Bernhard> This is fixed with gcc trunk (i.e. 4.4.0). Ok, we won't get that in BR before the release, so I'll mark it as BROKEN for now. >> mips: ok >> mipsel: ok >> nios2: broken in kernel headers Bernhard> Would need love as it's a bit outdated. Exactly, and apparently no one cares, so I'll mark it as BROKEN for now. Is nios2 support evan available in upstream gcc? >> powerpc: ok >> s390: broken in uclibc Bernhard> s/broken/not yet supported/ True, but the outcome is the same ;) >> sh4: ok >> sh64: broken in kernel headers (merged with sh?) Bernhard> both sh64 and sh* build fine for me. Ok, will check. >> x86_64: broken in uclibc Bernhard> works for me. What's failing? uclibc build - See bottom of http://uclibc.org/~jacmet/br/x86_64.log >> - alpha: I'll retry with the "new" pthreads and see if that works >> - ia64 and sparc issue seems similar, will ask on the uclibc list >> - sh64: Anyone knows if that got merged with sh4 like powerpc did? Bernhard> there are SH and SH64. SH[234] are just SH variants -- think Bernhard> i?86 or mips?e{l,b} Yes, but the kernel only has arch/sh - Should that also be used for sh64? >> - s390: Shouldn't really have been added in the first place as there's >> no uclibc support. Will remove (Bernhard agrees) Bernhard> Strictly speaking this should depend on Bernhard> !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT until it is supported in uClibc. I Bernhard> agree that it could just me removed from BR for now. Ok, will do. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard