From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:21:24 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 07/15] ltp-testsuite: bump version and use autotargets In-Reply-To: <20101212123150.77a2569e@surf> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:31:50 +0100") References: <87bp4slyo4.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20101212123150.77a2569e@surf> Message-ID: <87aakaljiz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: Thomas> On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:42:03 +0100 Thomas> Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> Does it really not work on uClibc? This is afaik the first package we >> have that is glibc only. Thomas> ltp-testsuite uses sigset(), which is obsolete. uClibc can Thomas> implement it, but not with our default configuration. I thought Thomas> ltp-testsuite was not of sufficiently general usage to decide Thomas> to make the change of our default uClibc configuration. The Thomas> option is UCLIBC_HAS_OBSOLETE_BSD_SIGNAL. Ok. Thomas> BTW, I have the same problem with the mrouted package, which Thomas> needs UCLIBC_SUPPORT_AI_ADDRCONFIG enabled in uClibc to Thomas> compile. For this package, I just added a comment in the Thomas> Config.in help text mentionning this. Should I do the same with Thomas> ltp-testsuite ? Yeah, I would say this is good enough. Thomas> I'm not sure how to handle those types of packages, that can Thomas> work with uClibc, but not with our default uClibc Thomas> configuration, and who are probably not of enough general use Thomas> to require a change of our default uClibc configuration. We could ofcourse add toolchain knobs for all of these, but as you say they are probably not worth the effort / extra complexity. I think just leaving them like this is good enough. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard