From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
To: Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr>
Cc: "Yann E . MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>, buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC 1/1] boot/edk2: unset MAKEFLAGS in build environment
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 21:09:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bk9t9cip.fsf@48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231231181437.582286-1-ju.o@free.fr> (Julien Olivain's message of "Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:14:37 +0100")
>>>>> "Julien" == Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr> writes:
> Yann reported in [1] that edk2 build could sometimes fail. The issue
> can be reproduced when per-package directories is enabled, or also
> when building on a system with GNU Make >= 4.4 using the
> "--shuffle=reverse" option (such as Fedora 39). Those are pointing
> toward a Makefile dependency issue.
> The issue can be reproduced with commands:
> cat > .config <<EOF
> BR2_riscv=y
> BR2_RISCV_64=y
> BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL=y
> BR2_TARGET_EDK2=y
> EOF
> make olddefconfig
> Then, building either with:
> make --shuffle=reverse
> Or:
> utils/config -e BR2_PER_PACKAGE_DIRECTORIES
> make olddefconfig
> make -j$(nproc)
> It is interesting to mention that when using "make --shuffle=reverse"
> to build, the build can be completed if restarted only with "make". It
> will not pull any other Buildroot package. This fact hints toward a
> Makefile dependency issue internal to the EDK2 build system, rather
> than in the Buildroot recipe.
> The EDK2 build system is quite unique. See [2]. It generates files,
> makefiles and internally uses GNU Make to compile code. This system is
> likely not tested as being a sub-Make process in a complex Makefile
> such as Buildroot.
> In order to prevent Buildroot to pass unexpected Make flags to the
> EDK2 sub-Make, this commit unset the MAKEFLAGS variable in the EDK2
> build environment. This will put the EDK2 build script in a more
> common and tested state. See GNU Make documentation about recursive use
> of Make, more specifically [3].
> Note: as mentioned, the build failure is likely due to an internal
> issue of the EDK2 build system. The failure points to a missing
> dependency in the EDK2 generator itself. This commit does not fix this
> issue, but rather put the EDK2 build system in a normalized
> environment, avoiding Buildroot flags being passed to the internal
> EDK2 sub-Make invocation. The upstream EDK2 build system most likely
> need a fix too.
> Fixes:
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target '/buildroot/output/build/edk2-edk2-stable202308/Build/RiscVVirtQemu/RELEASE_GCC5/RISCV64/MdeModulePkg/Application/UiApp/UiApp/DEBUG/UiApp.efi', needed by '/buildroot/output/build/edk2-edk2-stable202308/Build/RiscVVirtQemu/RELEASE_GCC5/FV/Ffs/462CAA21-7614-4503-836E-8AB6F4662331UiApp/UiApp.offset'. Stop.
> build.py...
> : error 7000: Failed to execute command
> make tbuild [/buildroot/output/build/edk2-edk2-stable202308/Build/RiscVVirtQemu/RELEASE_GCC5/RISCV64/MdeModulePkg/Application/UiApp/UiApp]
> build.py...
> : error F002: Failed to build module
> /buildroot/output/build/edk2-edk2-stable202308/MdeModulePkg/Application/UiApp/UiApp.inf [RISCV64, GCC5, RELEASE]
> [1] https://lists.buildroot.org/pipermail/buildroot/2023-December/681507.html
> [2] https://tianocore-docs.github.io/edk2-BuildSpecification/draft/4_edk_ii_build_process_overview/42_build_process_overview.html
> [3] https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Options_002fRecursion
> Reported-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr>
Nice description!
Committed to 2023.02.x and 2023.11.x, thanks.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-10 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-31 18:14 [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC 1/1] boot/edk2: unset MAKEFLAGS in build environment Julien Olivain
2024-01-01 21:27 ` Yann E. MORIN
2024-01-10 20:09 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bk9t9cip.fsf@48ers.dk \
--to=peter@korsgaard.com \
--cc=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=ju.o@free.fr \
--cc=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox