From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:51:11 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Binutils version used on MIPS In-Reply-To: <20140702174647.4021cc92@free-electrons.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Wed, 2 Jul 2014 17:46:47 +0200") References: <20140701201445.3caa5150@free-electrons.com> <53B3B9F4.9010800@imgtec.com> <87simjbx8x.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20140702174647.4021cc92@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <87bnt7bkuo.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: Hi, >> Time has perhaps come to move to 2.23 or 2.24, I don't really know. > Right, but Vicente patch simply removes the usage of a special version > for MIPS, so MIPS now just uses whatever is the default version used > for all architectures in Buildroot. Which I think is the right thing to > do, unless there are special reasons to use a different version than > the default one (such as AVR32 need of an old version, or > Microblaze/PowerPC64LE need of a new version). Yes, I completely agree, my comment was in regard to the references to 2.23 / 2.24. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard