From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:42:05 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] busybox: rename patches as per the new standard and update 1.21.0 mdev In-Reply-To: <5176F8B6.8020204@mind.be> (Arnout Vandecappelle's message of "Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:10:14 +0200") References: <1366723305-14386-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <8761zde433.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <5176F8B6.8020204@mind.be> Message-ID: <87bo94divm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle writes: Arnout> On 23/04/13 16:04, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >>>>>>> "Gustavo" == Gustavo Zacarias writes: >> Gustavo> Rename patches as per the patch naming policy and update the Gustavo> mdev fix patch for 1.21.0 which reinstates subsystem matching Gustavo> functionality. >> >> Sorry, I disagree with this rename. I know this is what we discussed at >> the dev day, but it imho makes more sense to use the upstream naming >> convention for busybox: >> >> http://busybox.net/downloads/fixes-1.21.0/ Arnout> Actually, if upstream has the patches available for download, Arnout> they should be downloaded instead of of included in buildroot, Arnout> no? True. For busybox our patch download infrastructure unfortunately doesn't work as the patches aren't located in the same directory as the tarball (and the fact that we support multiple versions also makes it a bit more complicated). -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard