From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 09:43:44 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/5] qt5: bump to 5.1.1 In-Reply-To: <20130919205514.53b092ff@skate> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Thu, 19 Sep 2013 20:55:14 +0200") References: <201309182118.23091.fatih.asici@gmail.com> <20130919062450.10f51848@skate> <1379568660.27759.4.camel@viko> <523B3759.1000901@mind.be> <20130919205514.53b092ff@skate> Message-ID: <87d2o2bowf.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: Thomas> Dear Arnout Vandecappelle, Thomas> On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 19:41:45 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: >> Perhaps we could try upstreaming our mkspecs? Does that make sense? Thomas> Our mkspecs is really meant to be a template that has to be tuned by Thomas> the qt5base.mk makefile, and therefore outside Buildroot itself I Thomas> believe its meaning is not so important. We could even carry it within Thomas> package/qt5/qt5base/ rather than as a patch, for example. That might indeed be a good idea. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard