Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] out of tree kernel patches question
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:33:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efowy4ib.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <trinity-0d97f4a0-c1ac-416e-bfea-7bcafcb3ce1d-1510924577452@3c-app-mailcom-bs07> (daggs@gmx.com's message of "Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:16:17 +0100")

>>>>> "daggs" == daggs  <daggs@gmx.com> writes:

 > Greetings,
 > when it comes to the odroidc2 support, there are 3 things that I'm concerned about:
 > 1. gcc is limited to 4.9.x
 > 2. old uboot (2005.11).
 > 3. very old kernel (3.14.79).

 > #1 is needed because #2, currently upstream uboot support this board
 > from 2007.05 but I've tried for months to get upstream uboot to work
 > with the vendor's kernel without any luck.
 > unfortunately, the uboot mailing list isn't helpful at all (no one seems to care much),
 > this means that in order to solve issue #2, the kernel needs to be upgraded.
 > latest upstream kernel holds bask support for this board, the
 > development is progressing. now assuming that I take patches existing
 > in the kernel mailing list that adds missing support for features in
 > the kernel to a point that the board can be used in a decent manner,
 > what is the policy of adding out of the kernel patches to a board in
 > buildroot?

Maybe it makes more sense to do it the other way around? First move to
the mainline kernel and once that is done move to mainline u-boot as
well. I've used 4.13 with the vendor u-boot without problems.

The only issue I am aware of for moving to mainline u-boot was an issue
with HDMI output, as the driver assumed certain things were initialized
in the bootloader, which was true for the vendor one but not mainline -
But that is getting fixed:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/17/134

As for carrying patches in Buildroot - That is OK for me as long as they
are not huge and the patches are only temporary (E.G. patches have
already been submitted upstream and hopefully acked, but they just
haven't been merged yet).

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-17 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-17 13:16 [Buildroot] out of tree kernel patches question daggs
2017-11-17 20:24 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-18  7:43   ` daggs
2017-11-18  8:26     ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-11-18 12:10       ` daggs
2017-11-20 20:34         ` daggs
2017-11-20 20:50           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-17 21:33 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2017-11-18  7:47   ` daggs
2017-11-18  8:02     ` Peter Korsgaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87efowy4ib.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk \
    --to=peter@korsgaard.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox