From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 23:07:04 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCHv2 04/14] gcc: fix Fortran support In-Reply-To: <1378138000-12739-5-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Mon, 2 Sep 2013 18:06:30 +0200") References: <1378138000-12739-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1378138000-12739-5-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <87eh8pkd53.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: Thomas> This commit fixes the Fortran support in the gcc package by making Thomas> sure that the runtime Fortran library is properly installed to the Thomas> target. Thomas> It also takes this opportunity to slightly reword the Config.in option Thomas> help text, to no longer mention gcc < 4.2 since they are no longer Thomas> supported in Buildroot, and to have a more meaningful explanation. Thomas> Finally, it fixes the gcc-final.mk code to use the correct Thomas> BR2_INSTALL_FORTRAN option rather than the non-existing Thomas> BR2_GCC_CROSS_FORTRAN option, to decide whether Fortran support should Thomas> be enabled or not in the cross-compiler. Committed, thanks. I wonder if we shouldn't deprecate fortran (and objc) support and get rid of them. Is there really a use case for them? Any interesting sw that needs them? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard