From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:27:49 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit master 1/1] Config.in: mark BR2_CONFIG_CACHE as experimental and disable by default In-Reply-To: <20100829115812.17ac0bb5@surf> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Sun, 29 Aug 2010 11:58:12 +0200") References: <20100825153147.4915689016@busybox.osuosl.org> <20100829115812.17ac0bb5@surf> Message-ID: <87eidhz32y.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: Thomas> Hello, Thomas> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:30:38 +0200 Thomas> Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> commit: >> http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=b680672ad1b1c45e23cf89ddb217616274d68dee >> branch: >> http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=refs/heads/master >> >> As it is known to break with certain package combinations. Thomas> Can we take some sort of official decision about this ? Thomas> Supporting the configuration cache thing is not just having an Thomas> option or not, it's also all the patches that we're adding to Thomas> fix the issues found here and there (libglib2, lzo, etc.). It would be nice to keep it, but I honestly think the only realistic option is to get rid of it completely. I'll keep the patches for now for 2010.08, but we can start removing stuff afterwards. Unless anyone disagrees? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard