From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:26:54 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] What's up with the kernel names? (Again) In-Reply-To: ("Thiago A. =?utf-8?Q?Corr=C3=AAa=22's?= message of "Mon\, 16 Feb 2009 19\:21\:49 -0300") References: <87ab8u5ub5.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <083a01c98b86$99d10260$f53018ac@Glamdring> <08b701c98ba7$906b24f0$f53018ac@Glamdring> <1234382611.22044.8.camel@elrond.atmel.com> <87zlgsg26x.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <87eixxcni9.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thiago" == Thiago A Corr?a writes: Hi, Thiago> The current solution does allow you to do the exact same Thiago> thing, while still giving the flexibility of opting not to Thiago> use it at all. We are not limiting your options, but rather Thiago> giving more, why can't we just let this thread go? I agree, I'm also getting tired of it. The new setup is more flexible than before and still nice and clean. >> It is a good idea to make things as simple as possible, you are >> trying to make things simpler than that. Thiago> Hard coded prefix, suffix and extension plus symlink is much Thiago> closer to overcomplicated than current solution is to over Thiago> simplification. Agreed. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard